Here’s a reality examine of a few of the issues van der Veen mentioned on Saturday, plus a reality examine of a false declare made by a Democratic impeachment supervisor throughout Saturday’s closing arguments.
Van der Veen claimed that the rebel on the Capitol was “preplanned and premeditated by fringe left and proper teams.”
: That is false: there isn’t a proof that left-wing teams had been concerned in planning or taking part within the rebel. Members of right-wing groups, conversely, have been charged with each planning and taking part. Although Trump’s authorized staff has repeatedly tried to muddy the waters, the proof exhibits it was Trump supporters who had been overwhelmingly chargeable for the assault.
Quite a few members are alleged in court docket paperwork to have informed the FBI their actions had been motivated by their help for Trump — and a few have even said
they felt that they had been instantly instructed by Trump to take motion. Whereas some alleged participants
have idiosyncratic political histories and hard-to-pinpoint ideologies, there isn’t a foundation for the suggestion that organized left-wing entities had been concerned within the rebel.
It is also essential to notice that a few of the felony habits that day was allegedly deliberate prematurely, however some was not. Only a handful
of the 200-plus felony instances filed to this point point out that rioters had confirmed up that day with the intention of breaching the Capitol.
Trump and incitement
Van der Veen mentioned that the Home impeachment managers had not proven “a single instance of Mr. Trump urging anybody to have interaction in violence of any variety.”
He then added: “At no level did you hear something that would ever probably be construed as Mr. Trump encouraging or sanctioning an rebel. Senators, you didn’t hear these tapes as a result of they don’t exist.”
: It’s clearly not true that Trump has not made any feedback that would even “probably” be construed as encouraging or sanctioning an rebel. Multiple alleged insurrectionists or their attorneys have claimed to the FBI or in court docket that Trump’s phrases impressed them to motion that day.
It is potential that a few of the people who find themselves going through fees are merely making an attempt to shift blame to Trump after the very fact. However it’s abundantly clear Trump’s phrases had been understood by some listeners as a presidential endorsement of an rebellion.
Trump’s phrases previous to January 6
Van der Veen mentioned: “Mr. Trump didn’t spend the weeks previous to January 6 inciting violence. He spent these weeks pursuing his election problem by means of the court docket system and different authorized procedures, precisely because the Structure and the Congress prescribed.”
: It is a extremely incomplete account of Trump’s habits after the election. Relatively than merely file lawsuits and await court docket selections, Trump mounted a relentless public campaign to persuade his supporters of the lie that that they had been cheated out of victory. He additionally urged supporters to come back to Washington for a January 6 protest he promised could be “wild.”
Biden, Harris and condemnations of violence
Van der Veen echoed false assaults Trump himself had made up to now, claiming President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris “repeatedly refused to sentence” acts of violence throughout riots final 12 months.
Info First: That is false. Each Biden and Harris condemned riots and violence final 12 months on a number of events. They expressed help for peaceable protest.
In August, Biden said
, “I wish to be very clear about all of this: Rioting shouldn’t be protesting. Looting shouldn’t be protesting. Setting fires shouldn’t be protesting. None of that is protesting. It is lawlessness, plain and easy. And people who do it needs to be prosecuted. Violence won’t carry change, it is going to solely carry destruction. It is fallacious in each means.”
Harris distinguished between peaceable and violent protest in her personal August assertion, saying
, “We should all the time defend peaceable protest and peaceable protesters. We should always not confuse them with these looting and committing acts of violence.” She added, “We won’t let these vigilantes and extremists derail the trail to justice.”
In October, Biden and Harris issued a joint statement
following the deadly police taking pictures of Walter Wallace Jr., a Black man in Philadelphia who was carrying a knife throughout what his household mentioned was a psychological well being disaster. Biden and Harris mentioned that “no quantity of anger on the very actual injustices in our society excuses violence” and that “looting shouldn’t be a protest, it’s a crime.”
The timing of the trial
Van der Veen claimed that it was Democrats’ fault that there have been constitutional questions on holding an impeachment trial for a president who’s not in workplace. He mentioned, “They sat on the article. They might have tried the President whereas he was nonetheless in workplace in the event that they actually believed he was an imminent menace. They did not.”
: It’s inaccurate for van der Veen to pin sole blame on the Democrats for the Senate’s determination to carry the trial after Trump left workplace. Democrats did suggest to attempt Trump whereas he was nonetheless in workplace; it was Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell, then the bulk chief, who rejected the concept, rebuffing Democrats’ suggestion of bringing the Senate again on an emergency foundation for a trial earlier than Biden’s inauguration.
on January 13, the day the Home voted to question Trump, that there was no probability a “honest or severe” Senate trial may very well be accomplished earlier than the inauguration.
Trump’s previous feedback about violence
One among the Democratic House impeachment managers
, Rep. Madeleine Dean of Pennsylvania, spoke throughout closing arguments about Trump’s rhetoric earlier than the rebel.
“Donald Trump knew the individuals he was inciting. Main as much as January the sixth, he noticed the violence they had been able to. He had a sample and observe of praising and inspiring supporters of violence — by no means condemning it,” Dean mentioned.
: It is true that Trump had a sample of encouraging or applauding supporters of violence; we listed 9 examples in a reality examine Friday. However it’s not true that Trump “by no means” condemned violence or help for violence. Trump has issued repeated condemnations.
Trump was vocal
final 12 months in his denunciation of violence linked to racial justice protests and violence allegedly associated
with the Antifa motion. In each instances, he was clear in his efforts to make use of these incidents as a cudgel towards his Democratic opponents.
However he has additionally condemned violence of different kinds on a number of different events. These include
an anti-Semitic bloodbath at a Pittsburgh synagogue in 2018, the mailing of bombs
in 2018 to Trump’s political opponents and CNN, mass shootings
in Texas and Ohio in 2019, and an anti-Semitic stabbing attack
in New York in 2019.
“No nation can succeed that tolerates violence or the specter of violence as a way of political intimidation, coercion, or management. Everyone knows that. Such conduct should be fiercely opposed and firmly prosecuted,” he said
in a single October 2018 speech by which he mentioned the mail bombs.